Normal People

Now I’m going to see if I can keep up my blogging momentum by writing about a book I enjoyed well enough but don’t think I have much to say about it.

Sally Rooney’s Normal People seems to be something of a phenomenon, praised not just in the book world but outside it. For me, that says little about a book’s quality. Both good books and bad books break through, and popularity says little either way about whether will or won’t like a book. It does sometimes pique my curiosity, though, and that was the case here.

The novel tells the story of two young Irish people, Marianne and Connell, who grew up in the same small town, in different social classes and social circles. Marianne is rich but not well liked. Connell is working class and popular. Connell’s mother cleans house for Marianne’s family, so the two end up seeing each other outside school, where social pressures keep them apart. And a secret sexual relationship begins.

Over time, and after they both end up at Trinity College, they drift apart and back together, sometimes open about their relationship and sometimes secretive. They seem unable to ever honestly express their feelings to each other, as both fear the consequences of being open about their love. And that’s if it is love. I don’t know that either character really understands their own feelings. There is certainly love there, though.

Underneath the basic plot are layers that may reveal why these two have so much trouble coming together. Marianne is abused at home, and the way that affects her relationships feels a little too on the nose (but perhaps also realistic). Connell’s worries about money and his need for a scholarship creates difficulties that are mostly logistical (he has to take a job at home over the summer, for instance), but I also think it adds to his insecurities. In both cases, I appreciated that Rooney keeps these pieces of the characters’ backgrounds as undercurrents, rather than having them talk openly about them, but I also wonder if they’re too far under the surface. The class problem in particular is easy to forget about.

I also found myself wondering whether these two really are good for each other or whether they are merely convenient. In the end, I think it’s a little of both. They do genuinely care for each other, and, although they slip up sometimes in the ways they care, those feelings generally lead them well. But I also don’t think they are necessary for each other. If they don’t maintain their relationship, whatever sort of relationship it is, they both will be okay.

As for whether I loved the book, I really don’t know. I enjoyed reading it and cared about the characters and the push and pull between them. But other books about people this age have impressed me more. (The Idiot by Elif Batumen comes to mind.) The timeline jumps and flashbacks within them sometimes exasperated me, as I would lose track of when I was inside a flashback. I also felt at a distance from the characters, as is sometimes the case in contemporary fiction. I wonder if, by keeping the characters’ deeper motivations under the surface, Rooney creates too much distance.

Anyway, I’d read another Rooney novel but I’m not running out to do so. I don’t have a strong sense of whether Conversations with Friends is more or less well-liked than this book, but I’m curious as to what other think, so let me know if you’ve read either (or both) or seen some good writing about the Rooney phenomenon. I’m still piecing my thoughts together.

This entry was posted in Contemporary, Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Normal People

  1. says:

    It’s good to see these again. Thank you! TOMwww.thomasrhoerr.comThomas R. Hoerr, Scholar In Residence, University of Missouri-St. LouisEmeritus Head of the New City School Sent from AOL Desktop

  2. MaggieinSF says:

    I’m happy you’re back to blogging again! I read “Conversations with Friends” and enjoyed it immensely because the inner lives of both characters are so vividly revealed, and they seemed like real people rather than characters in a book. But I’ve been reluctant to pick up “Normal People” because her style feels better as a one-off than as an ongoing approach, if that makes any sense. I’m excited that you mention Elif Batuman’s “The Idiot” because I thought it was a breath of fresh air, very astute, quite funny, and also realistic in the way that life can be, wherein events don’t necessarily drive plot or create changes, they just happen. (An approach i came to love reading Colm Toibin.) Having said that, Batuman is not for everybody and I don’t recommend it widely, so it was a pleasant surprise to find that you’d read it.

    • Teresa says:

      What you say about the characters in Conversations really interests me. I think these characters did feel real, but I also felt really distant from them, especially in comparison to the main character from The Idiot, who was almost too real and familiar. This was similar to The Idiot in that a lot of the events just sort of happen and may or may not have major significance later.

  3. Christy says:

    The self-sabotage was interesting to me in Normal People. I know it’s a tired trope in novels of “if they’d only talk to each other” (especially with Connell), but the way Rooney writes it, it feels less like plot device and more like the everyday cowardice of people.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.