Kate Atkinson is one of my favorite living writers. I’ve read all her books, so any new book from her is a cause to celebrate. Especially exciting is the fact that Atkinson doesn’t just stick to one thing in her books. She writes a lot of historical fiction, but she’ll also play around with speculative fiction, and she’s written a fantastic crime series. In Transcription, she stays with the World War II setting of her two previous books, but this is a different kind of story altogether. Instead of being an introspective (sometimes speculative) novel about the nature of life and death, Atkinson’s newest book is spy thriller.

Of course, Atkinson being Atkinson, she plays around a bit with form. There are three timelines, the framing timeline is set in the 1980s, with Juliet Armstrong looking back on her life. Then there’s the 1950 timeline, with Juliet working at the BBC after the war and uncovering new mysteries related to her war work. And then there’s the 1940 storyline, in which Juliet works for MI5.

Juliet’s main job is to transcribe recordings of meetings between a government agent and a group of Nazi sympathizers. Most of these sympathizers are women looking to help their cause but not able to do a whole lot. By reporting their activities to a government agent posing as a Nazi, they not only provide possible intelligence to the British government but are prevented from making contact with actual Nazis.

Her other task is to pose as a possible recruit for Nazi sympathizers. For this work, she takes on a false identity and wins her way into a fascist social circle and seeks out incriminating information on their activities. On top of that, a high-level supervisor at MI5 has asked her to keep an eye on a colleague.

One of the fun things about this book, about almost any spy story, is seeing Juliet juggle her multiple identities. Atkinson cleverly shows Juliet’s gift for concealment early on, when we see her bluffing her way through an interview for M15. Yet I ended up questioning Juliet’s observational abilities at times. She doesn’t appear to be a perfect spy, but it occurred to me that in wartime, when everyone has to contribute, perfection may be less important than basic competence and a willingness to take a risk. At any rate, I liked seeing her wrangle her way out of tricky situations, even if I got frustrated at what looked to me like a tendency to miss what was right in front of her. (I read this while also being immersed in The Americans, so spy stories are very much my thing right now.)

By the end of the book, some secrets have been revealed that cast previous events in a new light. One revelation felt a bit like a cheat to me, creating tension in a dishonest way. But the groundwork for the rest was well laid early on, if you know what you’re seeing. As it turns out, we readers need some of the skills of a spy to see what’s in front of us.

This entry was posted in Fiction, Historical Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Transcription

  1. I can’t wait for this one – she’s such a brilliant writer.

  2. Marg says:

    I am intrigued by the sound of this one. I still need to read God in Ruins too.

  3. Amy Rea says:

    Atkinson is on a very short list for me, a list of “go out and buy the book the day it’s first available.” I can’t wait for this one.

  4. Jessie says:

    I’m a huge fan of both Kate Atkinson and The Americans too. I’ve been dying to read Transcription and your review has only made me even more anxious to get my hands on a copy!

  5. I cannot WAIT to read this book. I loved Life after Life, so I think World War II Kate Atkinson books are the sweet spot for me. :p Plus, spies! What’s not to love? I will be prepared for a dishonest revelation at some point, by which I mean I will try to read the end and learn of it in advance so that I never have the opportunity to feel cheated.

    • Teresa says:

      The revelation that annoyed me something like 3/4 from the end.Sort of like a cliffhanger before a commercial break, and then when you return the cliffhanger wasn’t what you thought. Annoying. The final revelation didn’t bother me as much. It actually cleared up stuff that bothered me, so I was happy that my suspicious feelings were right instead of the storytelling being clumsy!

  6. Sly Wit says:

    For someone who hasn’t yet read Kate Atkinson (except for picking up Life After Life but just not being able to get into it–no fault of the book just the space I was in at the time), is there an obvious place to start?

    • Teresa says:

      Her books are so different from each other that I suggest just choosing the one that seems most appealing. Behind the Scenes at the Museum is where I started, and I still think it’s wonderful. Case Histories is a good place to start as well if you’re in the mood for crime fiction.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.