Version Control

version-controlI’ve started and set aside several books in the last couple of weeks in what was starting to seem like a futile quest for a really good story. I very nearly decided to give up my intention to read as many Tournament of Books contenders as possible and just turn someone I could count on the give me a good story. But then I picked up Version Control by Dexter Palmer and was caught up in it.

Rebecca Wright, the main character in the novel, is married to a scientist named Philip Steiner who is working on something called a causality violation device (not a time machine!). She drinks too much and is uneasy about what’s happening in the world around her. She’s grieving the death of her son, and her husband is buried in his work. And then… events ensue. (There’s a time machine causality violation device involved, so the nature of the events should be no surprise, although the details may be.)

The first half of the book is mostly uneventful. It’s a lot of set-up, but I enjoyed getting to know the characters and situation too much to be bothered. The world of the book is in our near future. Self-driving cars are the norm, the president can pop onto our screens to talk to us anytime he pleases (shudder), and kids are given customized lessons on tablets at school. It’s just different enough to feel futuristic, but not so different as to feel implausible. And Philip’s scientific work is as much about tedious trying and trying again as it is about making big discoveries. We get the story not just of Rebecca and Philip’s daily life but also the history of their courtship and eventual marriage. They’re an odd pair, but I found their story pretty sweet, even though I’m not sure I could deal with really being close to either of them.

Once the big events ensue, we see how different experiences change and don’t change who people essentially are. Rebecca still drinks a lot, her friend Kate still has a fractious romance with Philip’s colleague Carson, and the guards at the lab still muse over what time travel really is. Yet everything has changed.

The book is jam-packed with characters who like to talk about big ideas. Rebecca’s father, a Unitarian minister, has regular debates about God with Philip. Kate and Carson both muse to friends about whether Kate is secretly or subconsciously racist and therefore unable to live happily in her relationship with Carson, a black man. And Rebecca’s colleagues at Lovability, the online dating service, discuss to what extent their clients are people vs. bits of data. Some of this may come across as false to some readers, but to me, it felt realistic. Not everyone talks about this stuff openly, but some people do. And Palmer avoids turning these discussions into places where he can drum into readers his own ideas regarding these issues. They’re part of the fabric of the world and worth considering, for the characters and us as readers.

I’m still mulling over whether the actual resolution of the plot really works. Is the world the novel ends up with the right one? How can we know? What makes a world the right one? There’s also a lot of scientific talk about transfer of matter and causality that sounds good—good enough for me to shrug, accept, and keep reading. How realistic the science is doesn’t matter to me. What matters is that it’s a good story with some interesting ideas. On that front, it delivers.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Fiction, Speculative Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Version Control

  1. Heather says:

    Ooh, this sounds like an interesting read. I’ll have to keep an eye out for it!

  2. Hey hey, I have this checked out from the library right now! I read the first little bit of it and wasn’t immediately engaged, but I have been given to understand that it starts slow and then picks up. Is this correct information?

    • Teresa says:

      That is correct. It really picks up at the halfway point. I was interested before that, though. I was charmed/fascinated/repelled by the story of how Rebecca and Philip first met, but that’s several chapters in.

  3. Stefanie says:

    ooh, this sounds all kinds of yummy! Judging by the length of the holds queue at the library it appears this might be summer reading :)

  4. Deb says:

    I haven’t read this book, but your review put me in mind of two recent reads: DARK MATTER by Blake Crouch, a new take on the old SF trope of infinite worlds of maybe where a man keeps leaping through versions of reality trying to get back to his reality. And “The Story of Your Life” a short story by Ted Chiang and the basis of the movie “Arrival” as a linguist and a physicist fall in love and marry, even though (SPOILER) by learning an alien language, the linguist knows their child will eventually die. Perhaps it’s just that a lot of these ideas are filtering through fiction right now and so I keep reading similar things in different places.

    • Teresa says:

      I haven’t read either of those, but I did see Arrival. I hadn’t thought to link them together, but there are some common threads, especially with both main characters losing a child. This was a really interesting take on time travel/future knowledge because only one reality can exist in this book. Which is also like Arrival, now that I think about it.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s