The Silent Woman

silent-womanI started Janet Malcolm’s book The Silent Woman in the belief that it was a biography of Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. I’ve never read much Plath — just the most-anthologized poems — and even less Hughes, and I only know the barest outline of what happened in that fraught relationship, so I was ready to learn. I was surprised and extremely pleased to find out that The Silent Woman has elements of biography — I did actually learn some things about the lives and work of Plath and Hughes — but it is actually a book about biography itself. Malcolm spends most of the book examining the rights of the dead and the living, the experience of the biographer, the relationships that form when someone is writing a biography, and the demands the reader makes on the biographer and on the subject of the biography. It’s a complex work: let me think about it a little here.

One of the things that makes the relationship between Plath and Hughes so suitable for a book like this is that one person in the relationship is dead and one is alive (or was at the time.) In our way of looking at things, dead people have no right to privacy. We can find out whatever we like about them, say whatever we please. But live people do have rights (and Ted Hughes had been fiercely defending his rights for a long time.) What is the balance? What happens when saying something about a dead person hurts the living? Malcolm puts it this way (beautifully):

What Hughes is protesting is being treated as if he were dead. The issue between the Hugheses and the public hostile to them is whether or not the Hugheses are dead. They have compromised their claim to being alive by their financial gains from the dead poet’s literary remains. They have eaten the pomegranate seeds that tie them to the underworld.

Malcolm goes on to say that Plath’s advocates want to restore her the rights she lost when she died: they want to uncensor her journals and letters, they want to take away Ted Hughes’s power over her literary estate. But (says Malcolm)

by so doing, by restoring Plath to the status of the living, they simply achieve a substitution: they send the Hugheses and Mrs. Plath down to take Plath’s place among the rightless dead.

Malcolm also discusses at length the tangled relationships that form between a biographer and her subjects — living or dead. Anne Stevenson’s biography Bitter Fame was generally panned for being under Olwyn Hughes’s control, but as The Silent Woman unfolds, Malcolm lets us see Olwyn’s “spider’s invitation” and how Stevenson (eventually — after years of information and communication) broke free. She points out that readers expect that alliance with the concept that the dead have no rights, and any softening there — any notion that the living might be protected, that a quotation might be removed if it’s damaging or hurtful or unflattering — is anathema. Is that right? Is it necessary? Why?

As the book goes on, we can also see that Malcolm herself takes sides. She is on Anne Stevenson’s side, for one thing. For another, she romanticizes Ted Hughes to a weirdly strong degree. Malcolm never meets Hughes (she does meet his sister Olwyn) and yet she compares him to Prometheus and Chekhov, she pities him for being trapped by biography, she is “electrically” drawn to his letters, and so on. It’s odd. By contrast, Plath comes across as a nebulous, difficult, abrasive person.

The interesting thing about that is not that she has a bias, of course. It’s that she openly discusses the impossibility of not having bias. She says that biography is a genre in which “the pose of fair-mindedness, the charade of evenhandedness, the striking of an attitude of detachment can never be more than rhetorical ruses.” She describes interviews in which people are polite to each other but are actually trying to use and outwit each other. Well, then, might as well be open about it, yes?

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book. It was complicated and well-written, and while I’d probably have liked just a tiny bit more signposting of her own foibles, I think it’s well worth investigating. Are all her books this interesting? There may be more in my future.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Biography, Nonfiction, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Silent Woman

  1. Maria says:

    What an Fasinating review. The subject/s of course are of endless fascination but this thoughtful analysis has really piqued my curiosity. Such crisp writing by the writer. I’m off to locate and read about thr Hughes and more …

    • Jenny says:

      I believe there’s a lot of scholarship out there on the pair of them, and Malcolm makes it all sound very fraught. This was a very interesting place to begin for a beginner!

  2. Teresa says:

    I’ve read two of her true crime books (The Journalist and the Murderer and Iphigenia in Forest Hills). They’re both similar to this one in that they dive into complex questions beyond the case at hand, which makes them interesting reading even if you don’t care much about the specific case. I don’t think either of those books is nearly as good as this one, but they were pretty quick reads that I thought were worth the time.

    I read Plath’s Ariel not long after reading this, and she comes across as abrasive there, but in a really satisfying way.

    • Jenny says:

      I am by no means averse to abrasive women, as you know. I’m not even sure that Malcolm is — but she certainly doesn’t spend the time making Plath real to us in the way she does with Hughes (who of course is as absent as Plath is, in his own way.) I’d like to read Ariel.

  3. I haven’t read everything Malcolm has written, but to me, The Silent Woman was much *much* more interesting than the books of hers I’ve read that focus on crimes. I liked Two Lives not quite as well as this one — that’s her book about Gertrude Stein — but probably second-best of the books of hers I’ve read? I think she really works for me as a writer of literary biography. So maybe that one next?

    • Jenny says:

      Literary biography is one of my favorite things. I was in fact just remembering how much I like Claire Tomalin in that context. So indeed, maybe that one next!

  4. Stefanie says:

    Oh wow, this sounds really interesting and really good!

  5. JaneGS says:

    I really enjoyed reading The Silent Woman, and your review of it was just fabulous. I tend to like books about the writing process, and this one about biography was so compelling and insightful and thoughtful. Well done.

    • Jenny says:

      I’m so glad you enjoyed the book. I like books about writing, too, and it’s a joy to find one that’s this interesting.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s