The Girls

The GirlsEmma Cline’s debut novel has been poised to be the “it” book of the summer. But is it any good?

Much of the buzz I heard about The Girls focused on its fictionalization of the Manson murders. But this book is less “Helter Skelter” and more “She’s Leaving Home.”

The book’s narrator, Evie Boyd, is a middle-aged woman looking back on the summer when she was 14, confused and lonely and intensely curious about sex and adulthood but lacking any guidance from parents. And so after living “alone” for so many years, Evie takes up with a young woman named Suzanne. The disheveled and seemingly independent Suzanne fascinates Evie from the start: “She seemed as strange and raw as those flowers that bloom in lurid explosion once every five years, the gaudy, prickling tease that was almost the same thing as beauty.” And so Evie follows Suzanne to Russell and the community of hippies formed around him, looking for a new way of living.

The first chapters of the book, where Evie is in stasis, trying to figure herself out, are slow and don’t offer much that seemed original to me. The writing is sometimes nice, and sometimes overworked. The line quoted above is a typical example–evocative, but drawing too much attention to itself. The story improves as Evie joins Russell’s community and tries to understand that world and figure out her place in it.

In a way, Russell’s community, as dysfunctional as it is, is a microcosm of the larger world. Evie finds herself going along with rules that don’t make sense, and ends up committed to people who don’t necessarily care about her. She’s glad for the attention and the chance to identify herself as something special, so she doesn’t see that she’s just being who she’s told to be.

Much of the attention that Evie receives and gives is sexual, and it appears that it’s the only language women around her really have. In fact, the framing device of Evie talking to young relatives of a friend shows the same drama playing out, as a young woman accepts intolerable circumstances for sexual attention, the only attention she gets. It’s only when Evie is able to spend time with a woman who is in a relationship but also herself, ready to walk away, that she’s able to see the disorder and degradation she’s living in. But even then, she can’t quite walk away on her own.

As for the Manson-esque murders, they’re not the focus on the book, and I wonder if the book would be better without the specter of the murders looming. What role do the murders play in the narrative? Are they meant to show female fury unleashed? I don’t buy that, not when the women are acting at a man’s behest against people who’ve done nothing to them. Perhaps it’s women’s frustration and powerless lashing out. Or maybe the role of the murders is merely to build tension, which seems a little cheap to me. But cheap or not, wondering how they’d play out kept me reading, so if that was the intent, it worked.

As for my initial question of whether this book is good, it is. I’m not sorry I read it. But I’m not convinced it’s an “it” book with staying power.

I received an e-galley of this book for review consideration via Netgalley.

This entry was posted in Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to The Girls

  1. Elle says:

    Whenever I see books getting as much attention as this one has, I suspect they’re not All That. Your review is convincing me that this one, indeed, isn’t!

  2. Amy says:

    I’m leery of “it” books for a number of reasons. I’m on the waitlist at the library for it; I’ll save my book-buying money for more of a sure thing for me.

    • Teresa says:

      Same here. I was interested enough in the premise to read this and might have read it even without the buzz (if I’d heard about it, that is).

  3. I’ll get back to you – I’m up to p100 and it’s just starting to happen…

  4. lailaarch says:

    Enjoyed your review! I’ve seen this one everywhere – it’s on the TBR but it will be a while before I get to it (library hold.) We’ll see!

  5. Deb says:

    I’m beginning to approach any book with GIRL (or GIRLS) in the title with trepidation. Ever since the GONE GIRL phenomenon, it seems as if GIRL is the go-to word.

  6. Ha! Staying power — yeah, not necessarily. I rarely think that these buzzy books of the year (which The Girls definitely is) are going to last forever. What I try to hope for, to avoid the problem of too-high expectations, is just a fun read, like Gone Girl. Fun and absorbing and clever. That’s what I want The Girls to be.

    • Teresa says:

      I didn’t find this nearly as much fun as something like Gone Girl. It’s not much fun at all. I think the marketing hasn’t quite captured what the book is.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s