Eugénie Grandet

EugenieHonoré de Balzac begins this 1833 novel with a detailed description of a melancholy street in the town of Saumur:

There is, perhaps, in these houses, a combination of the silence of the cloister, the desolation of the moorlands, and the sepulchral gloom of ruins. In them life is so still and uneventful that a stranger would think them uninhabited, if his eye did not suddenly meet the pale, cold look of a motionless figure whose almost monk-like face appears above the window-ledge at the sound of an unknown step.

What little buzzing there is in this quiet town concerns the future of the novel’s title character, Eugénie Grandet, a young woman just reaching marriageable age. Who, the town wonders, will Eugénie marry? Her father, Felix, is extremely wealthy (and extremely miserly), and so quiet, sheltered Eugénie is much sought after. But she expresses no preference—or much of anything at all—until her cousin Charles unexpectedly arrives from Paris. She becomes immediately fascinated with this flashy young men, and as she learns of his sudden misfortunes, she is overcome with pity and love.

In meeting Charles, Eugénie, who, despite being a wealthy heiress, has had to make do with very little, begins to find her own voice. She sees possibilities outside her immediate environs. Her heart has left the cloister that her father has kept her in by withholding money and cultivating his family’s dependence. And so Eugénie acts on her newfound desires, eventually causing her father to clamp down even harder, stowing her away as he does his wealth. For Felix Grandet is not merely miserly his money; he is miserly with all things—food, attention, affection, and plans. Even his stammer is doled out only when it serves to his advantage. All things exist to serve his greedy ends.

Throughout the book, Felix takes note of the household spending, even when the spending comes from his family’s own allowances. He expects them to live a certain way, storing up money just as he does. Extra lumps of sugar or pancakes for a guest are serious indulgences, not to be taken lightly.  Eugénie’s great crime is not that she wanted something, but that her desires caused her to treat her possessions as her own possessions.

In meeting Charles and releasing herself from her father’s influence, Eugénie finds her own power. But is this ultimately a good thing for her? The book’s treatment of the world outside is ambiguous. Charles seems to become his best self in the cloistered world of Saumur. On the outside, he is shallow and selfish. Poverty and quiet teach him to be different. Can he leave and remain that same man?

Eugénie certainly hopes for Charles to find success and remain her loving cousin when he steps outside. She has no choice but to remain with her father, always remaining faithful. Somehow, though, she manages to hold on to the independence she found when she met Charles. When she’s free of her father, she’s able to make choices to further her own self-interest in the way she sees fit. Her money gives her much of her freedom, but her purity of character gets some of the credit as well. She uses her money to defy convention, but her defiance is in devoting herself to goodness, choosing a sort of cloistered life for herself. In that life, “the greatness of her soul lessens the effect of the narrowness of her upbringing and the ways of her early life.”

The final lines of the short novel leave Eugénie in this cloister of her own making, and I wonder if she’s happy there. Balzac leaves the question open, I think. She does not seem angry or bitter, but we’re left with the idea that she feels a lack. Her money is no comfort. Instead, “money was destined to impart its cold glitter to her angelic life and to inspire a mistrust of feeling in a woman who was all feeling.”

Eugénie is the kind of character who could easily be written off as too pure, too obliging, too angelic, but I have a hard time seeing her that way. She is good, but her goodness is not weakness. In her, Balzac offers a character whose purity is her strength, and she is strong.

I read this book with the Slaves of Golconda reading group. Visit the Slaves blog for more perspectives and discussion.

This entry was posted in Classics, Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Eugénie Grandet

  1. While I know that Balzac meant for Eugenie to be a positive rather than a negative character, I can’t help but feel that she is still a part of the family portrait, in the way that Mafia wives and daughters are often portrayed as being in popular movies and books. You know, innocent and loving and genuine, but with all that conditioned by being provided for by crime itself. Though old Grandet is a miser and not a criminal per se, his wealth still is not freely shared or honestly provided to her. I somehow never quite warmed up to her cousin Charles. Thanks for your insightful review.

    • Teresa says:

      I couldn’t make up my mind about Charles. I thought for a while his change under Eugenie’s influence might be real, but I worried that it wasn’t. He was too focused on what was easy, I think.

  2. Yes, by the ending Eugénie has been able to repair some of the damage caused by her father. But not all of it, by no means all.

    Balzac described a later novel, Ursule Mirouët, as Eugénie Grandet with a happy ending.

  3. rohanmaitzen says:

    I loved the doling out of the sugar.

    I agree that Eugenie is not simply (dully) angelic, that, as you say, her purity is her strength. I was really interested, though, in the suggestions in the ending that she is not altogether pure — that she carries a kind of taint of her father’s miserliness.

    • Teresa says:

      I’m full of questions about her state at the end of the book. Is she happy? Is she good? Her mistrust can be read as a way of being a miser with her feelings, while being profligate with her money.

  4. Rebecca H. says:

    I was wondering as I read whether Eugenie would end up being miserly in exactly the way her father was — that her disappointment in love would make her bitter and greedy. But the ending is more complicated than that. This post and the discussion makes me think about how she is like her father in a lot of ways — she has the same stubbornness he does, the same ability to live her life according to very fixed principles, the same single-mindedness. They both show a disregard for what society thinks of them. It’s just that she puts her energy toward living simply and giving money to charity rather than living simply and accumulating money.

    • Teresa says:

      I appreciated the way Balzac makes it clear Eugenie is very much her father’s daughter without making her a copy of him. It would have been so much easier to make her a miser in the same way or to have her rebel and become generous in all things. But having her be miserly with affection instead of money is more interesting.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s