January Essays: The Deal Me in Challenge

ArtofthePersonalEssayAs I mentioned earlier this month, I decided to make my way through The Art of the Personal Essay, edited by Phillip Lopate, by participating in the Deal Me in Challenge. I’ve assigned each essayist in the book a playing card, and I’ll draw a card each week and read the pieces by that essayist that are in the collection. My plan is to write a few sentences on each essay and update monthly. If I stay on track, by the end of the year, I’ll have read the entire book.

Here’s what I read this month:

Joseph Addison: “Nicolini and the Lions”

In this essay, Joseph Addison sets out to determine the truth of the rumors about the lion that appeared with Signor Nicolini in the opera Hydaspes. Apparently, people thought real lions were used—or at least that the fight in the opera was real. On the surface, Addison treats the question seriously, yet the tone of the piece and his specific observations about the “lions” show audiences’ problem “does not seem to be the want of good taste, but of common sense.

I find it hard to imagine that this was a serious dispute, but perhaps in 1711, before photographic proof could have been produced, it would have been even harder to tamp down silly rumors that it is today. And it’s not like the world today isn’t full of silly rumors that can be easily disproved.

Ou-Yang Hsiu: “Pleasure Boat Studio”

This essay by Chinese writer Ou-Yang Hsiu, written in 1043, is barely more than a page long. In it, Hsiu describe the rooms set aside for leisure that he has renovated in a way that reminds him of a boat. He then goes on to consider the significance of boats: they deliver people from danger while also being dangerous. They are hardly places of leisure, yet he named his place of leisure after a boat, perhaps signifying that he likes “life afloat.” He then notes that boat travel can be enjoyable with just a few simple comforts. He’s named his studio after this type of boat. It’s impressive how he packs into so little space so much thought about what it means to take pleasure in life.

Abraham Crowley: “On Greatness”

I have to admit I didn’t care much for this one. Crowley is musing on how it must feel to be great and how greatness is not so great after all. It is difficult to achieve, and most who achieve what looks like greatness aren’t truly great. He prefers “littleness in almost all things. A little convenient estate, a little cheerful house, a little company, and a very little feast.” The main trouble with the essay is not the ideas Crowley espouses, but the copious use of classical references that weren’t familiar to me. So, really, the problem is with me, rather than the essay, but this shows one of the problems of the essay form. Many of them do build on ideas and references familiar to the essayist’s audience but not to readers hundreds of years later. An essay can be excellent but not have staying power, at least not with an audience unfamiliar with the important ideas and literature that would have resonated in the author’s time.

Richard Selzer: “The Knife”

Selzer is a surgeon, and in this essay he considers his work, specifically the knife he uses to do this work. His descriptions are cold and detached, but he still manages to make readers feel simply by describing what the work is like, how he sees himself—as a poet, a priest, an explorer, none of these things and all of these things. The most personal bit is when he describes how he was fascinated by the idea of surgery when he was young. He also tells a story of seeing an ant in the operating room. The piece is framed by a description of what is probably a fairly ordinary surgery, an attempt to locate and excise a tumor. It begins with the discovery and ends with the removal, and along the way, we see how violent this life-saving act of surgery is. The knife is about taking life, about tearing things apart. But sometimes the thing that must be torn apart is a deadly thing.

This was my favorite essay of the month. It shows clearly how the personal essay can be art and how such art can cause us to see something we thought we understood in a new way.

This entry was posted in Nonfiction, Short Stories/Essays. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to January Essays: The Deal Me in Challenge

  1. “This was my favorite essay of the month. It shows clearly how the personal essay can be art and how such art can cause us to see something we thought we understood in a new way.”
    And so much of that depends on developing an authentic voice within that essay which it sounds like this surgeon did. Voice is something that we work on with kids in school so much to lend authenticity to their work instead of the type of formulaic writing that is often the default position in teaching younger kids writing skills.

    • Teresa says:

      Each one of these essays felt like the writer’s authentic voice, each one different from the other.

      It took me years to feel safe departing from formula when writing. Even in college, my writing was dull and formulaic. That also meant it was clear, so I got good grades. It wasn’t until I took a writing class years after college that I was really pushed to write my way. We did a lot of reading of real-life literary nonfiction and experimenting with “trying on” some of the voices we encountered to see what style suited us.

  2. Pingback: Deal Me In – Week 4 Wrap Up | Bibliophilopolis

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s