One Art: Letters

one artYears ago, I bought a copy of One Art: Letters for my husband. How many years? I’m not sure: it came out in 1994, but it was probably not quite so long ago as that. Ten years ago? Twelve? Anyway, he never read it, and it sat there, looking imposing, on our shelf. Last month, I took it down, all 650 pages of it, and started reading.

Elizabeth Bishop is one of the truly great American poets. She is an undisputed master of form (see “One Art” or “Sestina”) and lived by advice she got early from her friend Marianne Moore: no matter how long it took her, she never published a poem until she felt she had perfected it. (Her long poem about Nova Scotia, “The Moose,” was begun when she was in her early twenties and completed when she was in her sixties.) Her brilliant, subtle impressions of the physical world are not confessional or autobiographical, yet as Randall Jarrell says in one of his astute reviews of her work, they could all say under them: I saw it.

Bishop’s letters are her second great art. This book, edited by Robert Giroux, is far from being a complete collection, even at this length: not only was she prolific, not only did she have many friends and a passion and talent for correspondence, but she lived in Brazil for fifteen years with her partner Lota Soares, and could keep in touch with the poetry world only by letter. She had a talent for long, deep friendships with other poets, with whom she could be completely frank about her own work and about theirs. (To be honest, she talks smack about other poets, too — what fun that is to read!) Some of her closest friends were Robert Lowell, Marianne Moore, Randall Jarrell, and May Swenson. She knew dozens of other poets, musicians, and literary people, along with less rarefied friends; she was private and shy, but with a strong sense of connection.

Bishop’s voice is lively and engaging, even when — maybe especially when — she’s not talking about much. I loved the years when she was writing in Brazil, dealing with day-to-day events, restoring the house she lived in with Lota, worrying about the servants’ babies, enjoying the scenery. She struggled with her health her entire life, from allergies and asthma to debilitating alcoholism, and this crops up in many of her letters to friends and doctors. Her eye for brilliant bits of detail is unerring: the color of a fruit, or a snatch of dialogue, or exactly what a toucan said. Not a surprise for someone who’s read much of her poetry.

Every once in a while come letters that are purely about poetry: explaining her own poems, very rarely, or more often appreciating someone else’s. There are long letters going through a new book of Robert Lowell’s, for instance, criticizing a word here or there, or confessing confusion about a line; saying what’s done well. There are letters talking about poetry as an art, too: what sacrifices is it worth? What can, and can’t, an artist do with poetry? What is e.e. cummings, or Frost, or Eliot, doing these days? These letters show Bishop as absolutely uncompromising. She wants her poetry taken on its merits, with exactitude, with no admixture of personality or pity or malice, as if the poems are carved from quartz. Yet she herself is generous, loyal, hungry, funny, sad and difficult. It’s revealing and lovely.

I’d never read a book of letters like this before. The oddest thing about it was reading only half of the conversation: hearing what Bishop says to Marianne Moore, for instance, but not hearing what she says back. The best thing about it was reading Bishop’s poems as she wrote them. When she mentioned publishing a poem, I went and read it, or if she mentioned publishing a book, I read the book. Questions of Travel was particularly good along those lines, with all the references to Brazil — I could almost see it before my eyes. I loved exploring this, and all the poetry, and the brilliance. I’d like to do it again, with someone else.

This entry was posted in Biography, Poetry. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to One Art: Letters

  1. Stefanie says:

    I have had a copy of this book on my shelf probably for as many years as you have! I see I am finally going to have to take it down and get to it right after I finish the Letters of Keats.

  2. realthog says:

    The best thing about it was reading Bishop’s poems as she wrote them. When she mentioned publishing a poem, I went and read it, or if she mentioned publishing a book, I read the book.

    This sounds like a labor of love: clearly you read many times more than the 650 pages of the book itself. Congratulations on an achievement!

    • Jenny says:

      It did take me about a month to read, but it was a real pleasure. It was a whole world, since Bishop was so well-connected, widely-read, lively, and deep.

      • realthog says:

        By the way, what’s the meaning of the book’s subtitle?

      • Jenny says:

        Do you mean “Letters”? It’s a collection of letters. Correspondence. Not to be a smart aleck (my fatal flaw.)

      • realthog says:

        Ha! Stupid that I am! I read the title in the first line of your review as One Art: Letters for my husband, and I was sort of wondering who Bishop was addressing as her husband. Could it be one of her partners?Was she being, like, yer metaphysical, referring to the husband she wouldn’t have? The mind festered with curiosity . . .

        It’s been a long week.

      • Jenny says:

        Congratulations: it’s Friday, and you’ve made it through with your metaphysics intact…

  3. mum61e says:

    I know you aren‘t a big Nicholson Baker fan, but I found The Anthologist to be delightful, informative and rewarding. Elizabeth Bishop and many of her poetic contemporaries feature as quasi-characters in the narrator’s reminiscences.

    Here are some letters to her from Robert Lowell:
    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/12/20/dear-elizabeth

    • Jenny says:

      I like The Anthologist very much, too — in fact, if you look back, I think I may have recommended it to you. Thank you for the link! This is just what I was hoping for.

  4. Alex says:

    I knew nothing of Elizabeth Bishop until we had a PhD student who was studying her and introduced a lot of the department to a write who is not well known in the UK. I love reading letters. they are perfect for bedtime because you are always going to be close enough to the end of one to put down the book when you start to drowse. I shall certainly see if this is available locally.

    • Jenny says:

      I do like reading letters and poetry at bedtime, for the very reason you say. And then you can mull it over as you’re falling asleep. Good for the brain, I’m sure!

  5. You know, it’s disgraceful but I still haven’t read a single poem by Elizabeth Bishop. The only poem of hers I’m familiar with is one that was featured in the movie In Her Shoes. *hides face in shame*

    The trick about books of letters is always that feeling that you’re only getting half the conversation. I’d love there to be more books of letters where we do have both sides, back and forth. That would be so neat.

    • Jenny says:

      Well, I looked it up, and the poem in “In Her Shoes” is one of my very favorites — “One Art.” So that’s not so bad. You might try reading that one, or “Sestina” or “The Fish” or “In the Waiting Room.”

      I looked it up, and there’s a book of all the letters Bishop and Robert Lowell wrote back and forth to each other. That would be cool to read.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s