The Sign of Four

The second of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes novels, The Sign of Four, finds the great detective restless and bored and turning to cocaine for stimulation. He tells Watson:

“My mind,” he said, “rebels at stagnation. Give me problems, give me work, give me the most abstruse cryptogram or the most intricate analysis, and I am in my own proper place. I can dispense then with artificial stimulants. But I abhor the dull routine of existence. I crave for mental exaltation. That is why I have chosen my own particular profession–or rather created it.

Most of my familiarity with Holmes comes by way of Laurie King’s version of the character in the Mary Russell books or Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss’s version from the Sherlock TV series, and it’s fun to see how certain qualities of the original made their way into the more recent iterations. This Holmes is most definitely the sort of man who might in his retirement believe he has nothing to live for, as in King’s Beekeeping for Beginners. I could also see him firing a gun repeatedly in his flat, as Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock does in the TV series. It’s interesting, too, that the show’s creators decided on gunfire, rather than drugs, to demonstrate this self-destructive streak in the modern character. I imagine with today’s Sherlock living in an age when the dangers of drugs are more well-known, the use of cocaine would seem too far outside the bounds–or maybe they just didn’t gotten around to exploring that angle in the first series. (I have yet to watch the second.)

At any rate, Sherlock’s need for artificial stimulants doesn’t last long because a young woman named Mary Morstan comes to 221B Baker Street seeking his help in solving a mystery related to the death of her father and a mysterious annual gift of a single pearl. She has just received a letter that she believes is related to the gift asking her to meet her the letter-writer at the Lyceum and to bring two companions if she’s mistrustful. Holmes and Watson agree to come.

As with A Study in Scarlet, the best parts of this book are those focused on the interactions between Holmes and Watson. Watson continues to be mystified by Holmes, and Holmes is beginning to find Watson useful. Watson’s tentative courtship of Mary Morstan is sweet, but I have a hard time imagining how this relationship will fit in the future stories. The fact that I knew Watson got married but knew nothing about his wife is probably revealing. But I’m reading these books partly because I know so little about the original characters, and there’s lots of room for Doyle to surprise me with the way he uses Mary. Holmes, as it happens, considers Mary useful but believes that something as emotional as love can only hinder the cold reason needed for his work.

As for the mystery, it’s fine as a vehicle for setting Holmes in motion. But, again, as with A Study in Scarlet, when the narrative turns to the background leading up to the mystery, the book suffers. And Doyle once again bases a lot of the suspense on creating an “exotic other” for readers to fear. The Indian characters, while stereotyped, don’t come off entirely badly, or at least no worse than their English cohorts, but the depiction of one character, Tonga, is unsettling, to put it mildly. This kind of thing is very much of its time, but I’ll be glad to get to some stories focused on Englishmen behaving badly.

This entry was posted in Classics, Fiction, Mysteries/Crime. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to The Sign of Four

  1. Alex says:

    Years ago I promised my PhD supervisor (to whom you PROMISE everything!) that I would read Sherlock Holmes. I even bought the complete works. I can tell you exactly where they are sitting in the garage right this minute – unopened. I really must do something about it. Aren’t most of them rather short? Perhaps the problem is the really really big book. This might be a case for the Kindle.

    • Teresa says:

      The novels are all pretty short, I think, but most of the works are short stories. I’ve been reading the e-book versions from Project Gutenberg. My next Holmes will be the first story collection.

  2. Mary is the best. I’m probably very influenced by the Guy Ritchie films, where she doesn’t take Holmes’ crap, calls him out on stuff, and he ends up respecting her so much that he trusts her with an investigation, but even in the books, Mary is of that school of pretty, practical governesses and other respectable working women that Doyle likes to write about. I’ll leave it to you to find out how she fits into the rest of the books, but, unfortunately, she doesn’t pop up much.

    • Teresa says:

      The sum total of what I knew about Mary came from reading your praise of her in your posts on the books, so I was glad to meet her for myself! I haven’t seen the Guy Ritchie films, but I may get to them at some point. (And I hope you try the Mary Russell novels at some point, now that you’ve just about finished the canon.)

  3. Lisa says:

    I first read the Holmes stories after a friend made me watch the Jeremy Brett TV series. I found them slow going, but I’ve been thinking it is time for another try, after reading the Laurie King books and also because I’ve read a lot more Victorian authors since then – both of which I think would make for a very different reading experience.

    • Teresa says:

      It’s been fun to read them with King’s version of Holmes in mind. I could really see the Beekeeping for Beginners Holmes in this book. I found that Holmes unconvincing when I read the novella because the version of Holmes in my head is still too influenced by the way he’s been passed down through the culture. It was nice to see that King was right about how extreme his need for occupation could be.

      • Jenny says:

        They do address this in the second series, in a kind of lighthearted way. (You MUST watch them, Teresa. I just finished seeing them on PBS, and if possible the second series is better than the first.)

      • Teresa says:

        I do intend to watch the new season. It’s in my Netflix queue–near the top even!

  4. DoingDewey says:

    I love the new TV show! Although you may not have noticed it because it is somewhat subtle, they do actually address the drug thing in the first season with Sherlock’s use of nicotine patches :)

    • Teresa says:

      I did notice the nicotine patches, but I saw that more as a way of updating the cigar-smoking than the drug use. Nicotine and cocaine fall in entirely different categories in my mind.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.