The Constant Gardener (audio)

A white Englishwoman and a black African man leave their Nairobi hotel one morning, purportedly to do some aid work. She is next seen in their borrowed vehicle, her throat cut. Her driver is with her, his head cut off. Her doctor friend who was traveling with her is gone without a trace.

The woman is Tessa Quayle, an impassioned, vivacious lawyer and activist who is married to the older and more staid British diplomat Justin Quayle. Her murder is almost immediately imbued with traces of sex and racism. Her beauty and youth are much discussed, as is her attachment to the African people. Her doctor friend and supposed lover killed her, it is said. Or perhaps Justin had her killed in a fit of jealousy. Other possible affairs are mentioned. She was asking for trouble is the unspoken subtext of all the chatter. But Justin refuses to accept this. Even as his colleagues attempt to keep him out of the investigation, he quietly works on his own to find out just what happened. He unearths a web of greed and exploitation, and the people behind it seem to now be just a step behind him.

I saw the film version of this book a few years ago, so I knew what was going on from the start. But that didn’t keep me from enjoying this book—as much as one might “enjoy” a story of such horror that, according to author John Le Carré, is a fairy tale in comparison to the reality. I liked the complex way that murder was framed, the way the conspirators fed on people’s biases to brush it under the rug. I also liked Justin for his dogged loyalty. The book was far superior to the movie here. Justin in the film is played by the luscious Ralph Fiennes and Tessa by the ethereal (but annoying to me) Rachel Weisz. In the book, Justin came across as older and more plodding—kind of a sad sack type, which I found endearing. And Tessa remained ethereal without irritating me. (Seriously, I don’t know what it is about Rachel Weisz. I can see that she’s talented, I guess, but I almost always find her performances grating.)

There are some great scenes in the book. I laughed at the moments when Justin is trying to get into Tessa’s computer with the help of a younger, computer-savvy friend. But when the book leaves Justin, it tends to drag. Most of the other characters were just a blur to me, and the details of the conspiracy are not always clear. The lack of clarity was exacerbated by the audio format, which prevented me from looking back and putting details together.

Tessa is depicted as a perfect white savior of Africa, which is problematic. But the book is at its core a British book, not an African one. It’s also a suspense novel with a social conscience, not an in-depth exposé. It does a pretty good job at what it sets out to do.

For much of the book, I was moderately interested, sometimes amused, sometimes moved, but I wasn’t fully absorbed. I liked it. I didn’t love it.  But I must tell you, the ending was fantastic. It’s similar to the movie’s ending, but the way it’s executed is even more chilling, and the last line will stick with me. I remember being stunned by the ending of the only other Le Carré novel I’ve read, The Spy Who Came in from the Cold. Apparently the guy can write endings. If I give him another try in the future (which I’m willing, but not chomping at the bit to do), I’ll remember that and probably persevere through the slow bits.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Audiobooks, Contemporary, Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The Constant Gardener (audio)

  1. Mark says:

    “Seriously, I don’t know what it is about Rachel Weisz. I can see that she’s talented, I guess, but I almost always find her performances grating.)”

    Sounds like you have a personal problem with her.

  2. Alex says:

    Agree: John Le Carré does great endings. The movie actually touched me more than the book because like you, I also felt a bit detached, somehow. Le Carré’s writing sometimes is too straight-forward to really reach your heart strings. This must be a choice from his part, because he deals with topics which could easily bring reader to tears.

  3. Melissa says:

    I’ve been on the fence about reading this one. I enjoyed the movie and have the book at home and I think it sounds like a pretty good mystery. I loved your descriptions. I think it’s funny how some actor/actresses just rub us the wrong way. I can’t stand Cameron Diaz, but I know some people love her.

    • Teresa says:

      The book is pretty similar to the movie, so if you liked the movie, you’d probably like the book. Then again, its similar enough that you wouldn’t get a lot that’s new.

  4. Stefanie says:

    I haven’t seen the movie but it seems like it got lots of good buzz. The fact that you didn’t love the book though makes me less likely to read the book or see the movie. Can’t read and see everything, right?

    • Teresa says:

      So true! The movie is worth a couple of hours of your time, though. It’s not the best movie ever, but it’s well-made and the subject matter is pretty interesting.

  5. Steph says:

    I haven’t seen the film version of this (it is on my Netflix Instant Viewing queue, however!), nor have I read anything by Le Carré but your review really piqued my interest. I normally consider Le Carré’s fiction to revolve around British and Russian spies, so it was interesting to hear about how he tackled a different area of the world. I am so accustomed to reading books that have good build-up and then pretty lousy endings, that I admit I’m excited by the idea of an author who can nail the landing!

    • Teresa says:

      I think in recent years he’s branched out to deal with the British foreign service in other areas, a good move now that the Cold War is long over.

  6. Denise says:

    I *did* love this book, both in print and in audio. I enjoyed the movie enough to buy it on DVD, but it’s the book I truly love.

    • Teresa says:

      I liked it well enough, but I wonder if I would have loved it more if I’d read the book first.

      • Denise says:

        I think that’s possible. That’s how I got immersed in the story. When the movie came out, I wasn’t disappointed, but I felt glad that I’d done the book first.

  7. Kathleen says:

    I’m intrigued by your comments about the ending.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.