The Dark Half

Back in the 1980s and early 1990s, before I started actually reading Stephen King, I was under the impression that he was a pretty messed up guy. Wouldn’t he have to be to write the kinds of books he writes? In The Dark Half, King explores that very question and comes to some unsettling conclusions.

This novel, published in 1989, is said to be King’s reaction to the outing of his alternate writing identity, Richard Bachman. The main character, Thad Beaumont, is the author of a couple of moderately successful literary fiction novels under his own name and several gruesome horror novels under the name George Stark. When Thad learns that he is about to be outed as Stark, he and his wife, Liz, decide to take control of the story themselves and put Stark to death while revealing that Thad and Stark are the same man. The trouble is, Stark turns out to be more real than they ever suspected, and he’s not ready to die.

As is typical with King, this is as much a novel of ideas as one of horror. This novel takes a hard look at the work of the imagination and what drives a storyteller to tell particular stories. Thad himself ponders this question as he considers his relationship with his work, both as himself and as George Stark:

He was a writer, an imaginer. He had never met one—including himself—who had more than the vaguest idea of why he or she did anything. He sometimes believed that the compulsion to make fiction was no more than a bulwark against confusion, maybe even insanity. It was a desperate imposition of order by people able to find that precious stuff only in their minds … never in their hearts.

Inside him a voice whispered for the first time: Who are you when you write, Thad? Who are you then?

And for that voice he had no answer.

Although I found the set-up and the ideas behind this novel to be compelling, I was not prepared for the extreme gore involved, particularly in some of the early murder scenes, as Thad’s alter ego takes revenge on those who have cooperated to bring about his demise. King does not generally hold back when it comes to violence in his novels, but he also does not generally feature the kinds of sick and ritualistic killings that appear here. Only Misery comes close to this, in my experience of King, and I thought the violence in Misery was less gratuitous than the violence here. In Misery, it built gradually and added to the claustrophobic terror. Here, it often involved characters we didn’t even have time to care about, and it felt over the top. That wasn’t enough to make me consider putting the book down, but I do mention it as fair warning to those who don’t handle violence and gore well.

Setting aside the extreme violence, I liked the way the novel was set up, and King builds the tension well in the early chapters. Thad and Liz are a likable pair. Their companionable banter made me believe in them and root for them, and the gradual revelations about the struggles they’ve been through only made me want even more to see them stay happy. As the horrors began to unfold, I worried for them. I also really liked the sheriff Alan Pangborn. The early scenes between Thad and Alan are wonderfully tense.

The early portion of the novel was great, compulsively readable, but the book lost some steam in the final third. This is not uncommon with King. I find that he often spends too much time building to the final confrontation instead of just getting on with it. In this case, the payoff is pretty strong, although I think King held back from the conclusion the story was begging for. [Spoilers: One reason I like King is that evil hardly ever wins in his novels. It’s reassuring to know that going in. In this case, however, I really think the whole trajectory of the book was heading toward something more ambiguous, and it just didn’t go there.]

When I’m reading King, I’m almost always immersed and entertained, and that was certainly true for most of The Dark Half. This didn’t turn out to be a favorite King novel, and I wouldn’t recommend it for someone looking to give King a try for the first time. It’s nowhere near his most interesting or entertaining work. I’d start instead with The Dead Zone if you’re interested in more psychological novels or The Talisman (coauthored with Peter Straub) if you’re more into fantasy.

This entry was posted in Fiction, Speculative Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to The Dark Half

  1. I tend not to like books with sick ritualistic killings. They are so often featured in mystery or horror books, that it makes me wonder how much they actually occur in real life. I hope it’s just a matter of authors going to greater and greater extremes to achieve an effect, and not that it is happening more and more!

    • Teresa says:

      I suspect it’s just authors going for shock value. I can deal with it in small doses, but it’s not my favorite thing in crime and horror fiction. King usually manages to shock without that stuff, which made this a disappointment.

  2. christina says:

    I haven’t read anything by King since middle school. (Well, I take that back, I read his memoir/writing advice book last year). The Dark Half wasn’t one that I read, but i agree, I like how King haunts you with the story and the ideas. The Stand has still stayed with me years later, and I hope to re-read it soon. I think the only book that I didn’t enjoy so much was The Tommyknockers. I can’t remember much about it now except maybe aliens?

    • Teresa says:

      The Stand is wonderful. Almost definitely in my Top 5 King novels (as long as The Dark Tower series is taken as one 7-volume book). I have not read The Tommyknockers, but I do think you’re right that it’s about aliens. I think it’s also one that Jenny (the real King expert on this blog) had said wasn’t much good.

  3. I do like King when he’s contemplating writing (I enjoyed Misery), but the gore gives me pause. Hmm. Perhaps you should write up a post talking about King’s works and how certain fans of certain genres should approve his oeuvre…

    • Teresa says:

      If it helps at all, the gore is pretty much limited to the first third of the book. (Well, the realistic gore, anyway. There’s monster gore later on.)

      Jenny would actually be the best person I can think of to write the kind of post you describe. She got me into King despite my former tendency to pooh-pooh him as a hack. And she’s read all his books.

  4. Bumbles says:

    Excellent review. He always tortures his characters who are writers, doesn’t he? That’s an interesting angle to explore…

    • Teresa says:

      King certainly isn’t kind to his writer characters. I think in the case of this book he’s exorcising some of his own demons. I don’t like to make autobiographical assumptions, but it is interesting to note that this was written at around the time he was dealing with his own addictions.

  5. Mae says:

    I’ve just recently realised that I’ve never actually read a Stephen King! It’s probably because I’m such a complete chicken when it comes to horror.

    • Teresa says:

      I used to be a chicken, too, but I’ve mostly gotten over it in recent years. And not all King’s books are scary. Of course, it all depends on what you find scary, but I don’t think all of his books could be described as horror.

  6. Jenny says:

    This one isn’t a favorite of mine (except the psychopomp stuff, which I thought was interesting and which he replayed in Bag of Bones, which I ADORE). I agree that King usually lets the good guys win, which is interesting for a horror writer — allowing that order to reassert itself. (There are some exceptions in his oeuvre, though! Scary scary ones!)

    • Teresa says:

      The psychopomp stuff was pretty neat, but I was more interested in the whole question of identity and the origins of creative ideas. (And Bag of Bones is not one of my favorites, although I think it was a better book than this one.)

      [SPOILERS] I was really hoping he would push the identity thing further and have Thad and Stark become a singular identity toward the end. There were a few flags that seemed to indicate that Thad was actually denying who he was and that this was at the root of his addictions, writer’s block, etc. I thought it would be interesting to have him accept his “shadow self” (i.e., Stark) as part of who he is, which would put him on the road to becoming a whole person and also prevent Stark from committing actual evil acts. There were a couple of moments toward the end that seemed to scream for this solution, and I thought King wimped out by having Stark destroyed.

      • Jenny says:

        [CONTINUED SPOILERS] He does this in “Secret Window, Secret Garden,” which is pretty much the exact same premise. I think King’s novellas are often more frightening and sometimes more successful than his longer novels (though he’s written so many, that’s a huge generalization.) It’s why I’m looking forward so much to Full Dark, No Stars.

        I probably exaggerated how much I loved Bag of Bones. I really did like it up until the very end. The villains were awesome and the premise was excellent, and I thought the grieving writer struggling with ghosts was very creepy. The ending kind of put me off, though.

      • Teresa says:

        I’ve actually forgotten a lot of Bag of Bones. It’s one I enjoyed while I was reading it and then promptly forgot.

        And yes I kept thinking of Secret Window, Secret Garden, which I also read this year. Much better. Tighter and more interesting. (I was, alas, spoiled by having seen the movie, so I could see the twist coming.)

  7. Kathleen says:

    I’m reading and rereading King over the next couple of years. This is actually one of his that I haven’t read before now but I’m a little put off by the violence. Lucky for me it will be awhile before I get to this one in the chronological order!

    • Teresa says:

      The over-the-top violence is mostly confined to the first half of the book at least, but ugh… it’s pretty awful. More than most of the King I’ve read.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.