So Much for That

For his entire adult life, Shep Knacker has been planning for “The Afterlife”—an early retirement to some third world locale where he and his family can get by on a few dollars a day. His handyman business has kept his family comfortable, with enough to spare that he has been able to put aside a considerable nest egg. The sale of the business brought the nest egg to a total amount that would enable him to escape—finally. But in recent years his wife, Glynis, has lost her enthusiasm for The Afterlife. So Shep has continued to work for the new owner of his old business, waiting for the right moment to leave.

As Lionel Shriver’s So Much for That opens, Shep believes that moment has come. He’s bought three one-way tickets to Pemba, an island off the coast of Tanzania. His plan is to present Glynis and their son Zach with a choice. They can come or not. Either way, he will fly away tonight.

Unfortunately, Glynis has news that brings all Shep’s plans to a halt. She has cancer and needs Shep’s health insurance. So Shep stays, taking care of Glynis, physically, financially, and in any other way he can think of. Glynis is determined to survive, and Shep is determined to be the same reliable man he has always been. But the U.S. health care system being what it is, taking care of Glynis means watching his nest egg vanish.

Meanwhile, Shep’s best friend, Jackson, and his wife, Carol, are struggling to take care of their teenage daughter Flicka, who has a rare disease called familial dysautonomia. Flicka has an acerbic wit, which endears her to everyone who gets past her deformed face and constant health problems and takes the time to get to know her. Jackson is a less endearing character, prone to rant about the government, taxes, insurance, parking meters, and everything else at the slightest provocation.

With health care reform all over the headlines this year, I’ll confess that I’m weary of the debate. I’m one of those who believes the system is broken and that something needs to be done. Shep’s insurance problems, which in part came down his employer getting insurance on the cheap, rang true to me. In this country, the quality of your health care frequently comes down to what your employer can, or chooses to, provide. You may technically be able to choose your own doctor, but if that doctor isn’t on your insurance network, you’ll be paying a hefty amount. And sometimes the situation can be downright bizarre, even when you have good insurance. I once had an excellent plan that included one of the best doctors in my area but did not include the hospital where she had surgical privileges!

So yes, I think Shriver is onto a serious problem here. But I’m tired of hearing about it. That wouldn’t have to have been a problem for the book, had not the characters spent so much time in long discussions of the issue. Political discussions, usually in the form of Jackson’s rants, went on for pages and pages and pages and pages and … argh! Enough! These kinds of discussions can be interesting to participate in once in a while, but that doesn’t make them good reading.

The other problem with the long political tirades is that they made the characters themselves feel false. I started to get the impression that each character was developed merely to illustrate another facet of the problem. Terminal illness is covered in Glynis. Chronic disease, Flicka. End-of-life issues, Shep’s father. Failed elective surgery, Jackson. Hard work that gets you nowhere, Shep. Lack of responsibility (i.e., mooching off the system), Shep’s sister. There were moments when I felt like I was reading a Jodi Picoult novel, where characters are not so much people as representatives of a point of view.

But then… then… the novel takes a turn and becomes more interesting, downright absorbing even. Instead of being a political novel, it becomes a novel about the value of life and the meaning of happiness. This theme ran through the novel from the start but too often drowned out by all the rants. When the rants taper off in the last half of the novel, the more interesting ideas start to get more “page time.”

I found some of the sections about Glynis’s personal struggle with cancer, and Shep’s work as a caregiver, to be both moving and thought-provoking. I’ve never read Shriver before, but I could see in some of these passages why she’s so highly regarded as a writer. Here, for example, Glynis contemplates her state:

Another revelation: it had never been clear to her before that thinking was an effort. That thoughts required energy. It turned out that very few thoughts, once laboriously formulated, proved worthy of that energy. Even this one: she could have lived without it. And that was the standard for everything now: mere living, aliveness. Yet it was beginning to slip through her mental fingers what being alive was exactly. It was entirely possible, for example, that aliveness was primarily designed by the capacity to experience pain, in which case it was befuddling why the state was so highly prized.

At moments like this, Shriver takes on essential questions about life and its value. Is life worthwhile merely by virtue of not being death? What are we living and working for? Is mere survival enough? Is it even the best thing? When the book dwells on those questions, it’s a fascinating read. It’s too bad that these questions get overshadowed by politics.

I read this book because it was a finalist for the National Book Award. In some ways, this book and Parrot and Olivier in America are counterparts to each other. Carey buried the thematic ideas in his book too deeply, and Shriver put the ideas right on the surface, making it come across as preachy. Each book has significant flaws but also includes plenty of good stuff.  So with three fiction finalists read, Great House remains my choice.

Other Bloggers’ Views

“I can’t exaggerate how much I enjoyed this book.” —Reading Matters

“Unfortunately I wasn’t a fan of this book – it felt like one long rant about the state of the US healthcare system.” —Farm Lane Books

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Contemporary, Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to So Much for That

  1. I’ve yet to read a Lionel Shriver book, but I don’t think I will be starting with this one. Sounds boggled down to be the book chosen to experience/tryout a author. I have a couple other books in my TBR of his.

  2. I really loved this one, but I don’t think it’s a crowd-pleaser. I didn’t mind the political and public health discussions because they didn’t feel one-sided politically to me. I admire Shriver’s ability to be subtle and cover many sides of the issue.

    I’m behind on my National Book Award reading, having only read this one and now reading Great House, but I would not be upset if this one won.

    • Teresa says:

      I agree, Carrie, that she does a good job cover multiple points of view—and the characters don’t always take predictable sides. I’m just tired of the argument.

  3. Danielle says:

    I really want to read Shriver and have a couple of books by her on my shelves–not this one though. I love the premise, but I’m not sure I can be patient enough with the debate (though am with you on thinking the system is broken and needs to be fixed). I’m so fed up with political ads in general that I can’t even watch the news as it is a constant bombardment of nastiness. It certainly seems a timely book, though, if you can get beyond the politics to the good stuff at the end.

    • Teresa says:

      Definitely a book that gets at the mood of the time, although I think I would have liked it more had it been published a year earlier. The arguments would have seemed more fresh then, but it still would be timely.

  4. Huh, a contemporary fiction example of an poorly executed idea novel. What a shame–the last bits sound fairly lovely.

  5. Steph says:

    It sounds like based on your reaction to this book that you probably wouldn’t enjoy Jonathan Franzen’s new book very much either. In my recent review, I talked about how his novel gets hijacked by his need to rant about issues, which are important, but need to be more subtly interweaved when one is writing a work of fiction.

    I have read one book by Shriver (We Need to Talk about Kevin), and while I thought it had some technical issues, I really liked how provocative it was. I like that Shriver tackles big questions that don’t necessarily have easy answers… Not sure if this is one I’ll read, though the fact that you found the latter half so good definitely intrigues. Coming from Canada, I definitely think universal health-care is the obvious solution as I really hate the way health-care is approached her in the States… I’m sure I’d find many parts of this book rather obvious and/or infuriating!

    • Teresa says:

      I have a feeling I wouldn’t like Freedom much either, based on your review and several others I’ve seen. Plus, I didn’t think much of The Corrections. It does seem extremely difficult to get those ideas in in a subtle way. Shriver does have characters who represent different sides of the issue and make different arguments, so that’s a plus, but by now I’ve heard most of the arguments. A year ago, I would have felt differently. And to be fair to Shriver, while she was writing, these debates hadn’t taken over the news—and it probably never took over the London media, where Shriver lives, to the degree that it has taken over here.

  6. I definitely want to read this one. The healthcare aspect really intrigues me.

  7. Lenore says:

    I have enjoyed every one of Shriver’s novels, and I will eventually pick this one up too. Nice to know going in what awaits me!

  8. farmlanebooks says:

    It looks as though we almost agree on this one. I agree that the long political tirades made the characters feel false. It just wasn’t subtle enough for me. It is such a shame as I love Kevin and thought Post Birthday World was good (although a bit repetive after a while)

    • Teresa says:

      I think I liked this a hair more than you did, but yeah, the tirades hurt the character development. I thought the last half just about made up for it, but some of those early conversations were so over the top. I couldn’t believe in the people behind them!

  9. Lori L says:

    While I have really enjoyed all of Shriver’s books, I’ve been avoiding this one because I know it’s going to annoy me. Perhaps I’ll decide to read it some day.

  10. JoV says:

    Give me any Shriver’s books I’ll read it any day. I have read “Kevin”, “Post Birthday Girl” and “Game control”, love the last two, Post birthday girl being my favourite.

    There is no one who writes like her and I like her intellectual sparring through all her characters.

    Can’t wait to read this one. :)

  11. cbjames says:

    It’s difficult to find much in the way of American fiction that deals with currently relevant, big issues. Most novels that qualify themselves as literature fail to include anything important in contemporary America.

    That this one does and then turns out to suffer from it is too bad.

    • Teresa says:

      I think these kinds of books are hard to find because they’re so hard to do well, as Shriver’s mixed success here shows. The more I think about it, though, the more I think it was a year too late for this book to seem fresh.

  12. Kathleen says:

    I’d have to be in the mood to deal with the all of the rants and tangents. I think I should probably read We Need to Talk About Kevin first.

  13. Christy says:

    I loved ‘The Post-Birthday World” and will pick up more Shriver in the future. Even with “Post-Birthday World” I wasn’t sure if I would like it at first and almost gave up about a quarter of the way in, but I stuck with it and was rewarded. There’s definitely ambition in her writing, and I can see how that could backfire if the ‘big ideas’ weigh the narrative down.

  14. Amy says:

    I just finished it, and really had issues with the ending. It seemed too tidy by far.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.