Invention of Everything Else

Invention of Everything ElseNikola Tesla was an inventor and engineer known for his work with alternating current, magnetic fields, and radio. His accomplishments were extraordinary, but before reading The Invention of Everything Else by Samantha Hunt all I knew about him was that he was a scientist who discovered some amazing stuff (although I couldn’t have said what). Hunt makes Tesla a character in this, her second novel, and readers are treated to an exploration of both Tesla’s discoveries and his eccentricities.

Set in New York City in the 1943, the novel alternates between Tesla and Louise, a chambermaid at the Hotel New Yorker, where Tesla is living out the final years of his life. Louise’s great loves are radio drama, her widowed father, and snooping in hotel guests’ possessions. Despite the snooping, I liked Louise right away. She has a sort of anti-social streak that I could relate to. She doesn’t participate in the chatter of the other chambermaids as they dress in the hotel locker room; she likes her chambermaid uniform because “it is a cloak of invisibility” that “allows her to be alone with her thoughts and her cart of cleaning supplies.”

I also liked how Hunt depicted Tesla. In the latter years of his life, Tesla showed signs of mental illness. He continued to work on his inventions, most notably on a “death ray,” but he was also devoted to the pigeons of New York. One in particular became a sort of confidante that Tesla referred to as his wife. Hunt immerses the reader in Tesla’s present state, but she also takes us into his past, both through the writings that Louise finds in his hotel room and through his own mental wanderings. The juxtaposition of his former brilliance and his later state made me think of how quickly we dismiss the eccentrics in our urban landscapes. There’s so much we don’t know about the people around us.

Another part of the book’s charm was in its sense of place and time. Hunt writes wonderful descriptions of New York life in the 1940s. At times, the writing gets a bit over the top, but it’s generally not a distraction, and it’s often quite evocative. Here’s a sample:

On her way to work Louisa heads over to Fifthieth Street where she can catch the Eighth Avenue IND. Most days she walks to work. It is not too far away, twenty-odd blocks. But the wonder of the subway lines stills thrills Louisa, so on cold or nasty days like this one she allows herself the small luxury of paying one nickel to ride the train down to the hotel. As she approaches the station she can smell the subway from above ground. It smells like rocks and dirt. She walks faster, hearing a train arrive. It forces warm air up the stairwell out onto the cold sidewalk like a tongue. As she pays her fare, the train pulls out of the station. Louisa hears another rider, one who missed this car by a narrower margin than she, moan long and low, whimpering as though he were a movie-house vampire exposed to the first piercing rays of sunlight. When Louisa arrives on the platform this man is mumbling, repeating the word damntrain, damntrain, damntrain, under his breath.

I could have done without the vampire image, but the rest put me right there with Louisa.

Where Hunt really goes over the top is with her attempt to pack too many ideas into this 250-page book. Louisa and Tesla and their eventual meeting are enough for a book of this length (or even longer), but Hunt throws in threads related to time travel, a potential love interest for Louise, an ambiguous three-way relationship between Tesla and two friends, the relationship between Louise’s parents, and the experiments of Thomas Alva Edison. Some of these threads take only one chapter; others are woven throughout the narrative. All of them have potential to further the plot or deepen the character development, but most of them aren’t necessary. I would much rather for Hunt to have chosen a couple of strands and given them her full attention instead of putting in so many different elements and not providing enough time for an adequate payoff. Was it necessary, for example, to hint at mysterious origins for Louise’s love interest, Arthur? No, not really. Had Hunt spent more time building suspense related to Arthur’s origins, it might have added significantly to the plot, but the hints never go anywhere.

In the end, the lingering effect is that the book itself is a sort of “invention of everything else,” instead of one coherent creation. Like a kitchen junk drawer, the book contains many treasures, but they don’t quite make sense together.

For additional reviews, see Gaskella, We Be Reading, Farm Lane Books, Lizzy’s Literary Life, dovegreyreader scribbles, and Savidge Reads.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Fiction, Historical Fiction, Speculative Fiction and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Invention of Everything Else

  1. Priscilla says:

    That’s too bad about the multiple threads, because it certainly does sound like an interesting idea! I laughed when I read your line about the vampire, because I thought the same thing while I was reading the quote. Of course, I also thought that never, ever in my experience has the NYC subway smelled like “rocks and dirt.” Oh, for such a time! I may give this book a shot anyway, because Louise does sound interesting.

  2. savidgereads says:

    I enjoyed the book a lot, in hindsight I dont think it is as great as I first did. I think I got drawn in very quickly but like you said there are occaionally too many threads but still an enjoyable read and an interesting debut… I think it was a debut, I might be telling fibs!

  3. Teresa says:

    Priscilla: Ha! I had the same thought about the subway smell, but then I thought that at that time, when so much new construction was happening, the smells would no doubt be different :-) Louise and Tesla are both interesting figures, and the book is short, so it’s worth trying.

    savidgereads: Yes, I was drawn in very quickly, but then I got frustrated at how much was going on. But parts of it are very good. I would certainly consider reading something else of Hunt’s (This was her second book; the first was apparently The Seas, published in 2006.)

  4. Kristen M. says:

    It’s been a while since I read this but I remember liking Louisa, feeling bad for Tesla and then the whole rest is a jumble.

  5. litlove says:

    It was interesting to read your review against some of the others you link to. Most people agree this was overly complex, and then opinons differ (which is always fascinating, I think). I have seen this book around, but I’m not generally drawn to books about scientists. Although I did enjoy Rebecca Stott’s Ghostwalk. Probably not one for me this time, and thank you for the review which helps me to see that.

  6. Annabel says:

    An interesting review Teresa and thanks for the link. I really enjoyed the book, immersing myself in the black and white movie style fantasy of it and being absolutely fascinated by Tesla. Like Savidgereads, with hindsight I don’t think it’s quite as good as I thought it was while I was reading it, but I am definitely going to search out a biography or two of the mad scientist – as the constant use of him as a character in novels is totally intriguing.

  7. I didn’t get this book at all. I agree with you that there were some great sections, but as a novel it was just weird.

    The premise sounds great and like Annabel I would love to read a Tesla biography, but this was a big disappointment. Great review!

  8. Teresa says:

    Kristen: Sounds about like how I felt about it. Louisa and Tesla are clear and interesting, but the rest is a jumble.

    litlove: That’s one of the reasons I like to link to other reviews. In this case, it’s clear we all read the same book and generally noticed the same things about it, but our feelings about what we observed ran the gamut. It just shows how subjective opinion can be.

    Annabel: I wanted to be more immersed than I was, but whenever I did get pulled in, the book switched gears again. I do agree that Tesla sounds like a fascinating character, and I liked the way Hunt wrote about him. (I gather she stuck pretty closely to the known facts, too, which is a bonus!)

    Jackie: Yes, it was too bad that the whole didn’t work as well as the various parts.

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.