An Expert in Murder

expert in murderI am often wary about new detective novels. Like the little girl who had a little curl, when they are good they are very very good, and when they are bad they are horrid. Give me Dorothy Sayers or Laurie King or Kate Atkinson and I’ll happily read my way through a weekend; give me a whole host of others and I’ll grumble and mutter about concealed clues, idiot detectives, clichés, and the long-winded villain’s speech at the end (affording the detective time to break free from the handcuffs.) So I’m wary. But when I saw that Juxtabook and Random Jottings and Nonsuch Book had all read and loved Nicola Upson’s An Expert in Murder, I gave in. At the very least, I’d be in good company.

As it turns out, I’m glad I took the risk, such as it was. An Expert in Murder is a well-written, original, solidly-plotted début novel. For those of you who haven’t already had this on your radar for a year, it takes place in the 1930s, in immediately prewar England (though it is the Great War that affects the plot, rather than the looming Second World War.) The beloved mystery author Josephine Tey has written a smash-hit play, Richard of Bordeaux, and has come to London for further negotiations about provincial tours and a possible film, along with talks about her next play. But before any of this can begin, a young woman she met on the train is brutally, humiliatingly murdered.

The investigation of the murder is done, not by Tey herself, but by her friend at Scotland Yard, Archie Penrose. This, for me, made the book far more believable, as the author-as-sleuth wouldn’t have worked well at all. Tey as a sounding board, for Archie and for other characters who found her sympathetic, was quite plausible, however. And as the body count rises among the tight-knit theatre crowd, sympathy is increasingly necessary.

As I said, this was a very enjoyable book, very well-written, seamlessly plotted and well-characterized. I did have a few nits to pick with it, though (you knew I would, didn’t you?) My main problem with the book was a large hurdle: I wasn’t convinced that the main character needed to be Josephine Tey, a real person. Why couldn’t it have been a fictional author with a similar resumé? Surely, since the murder and the cast were invented, so might the author have been. It simply didn’t seem necessary. Upson says in her afterword that Tey herself, despite having written several historical plays, disliked the mixing of fact and fiction. This seems an odd book to write, then.

The other two things that bothered me were much smaller. The characters were extremely open about their sex lives and sexual feelings, even with people they’d only just met. This would seem odd even for someone in the 21st century (TMI!) let alone for, say, a housewife in the 1930s. It rang a false note. And finally, one of the characters was adopted, and the tone of the novel implies that her life was spoiled because of it: “her childhood and family, her sense of who she was and who she could be.” This seemed an odd way to look at adoption, especially in the context of the book. It jarred on me, though maybe this was just my personal experience getting in the way.

These are small quibbles, though, in the balance of this excellent novel. Upson has created three-dimensional characters and has a good deal of insight into what makes people tick. I am certainly looking forward to reading the next in the series, Angel With Two Faces, to see what happens next with Archie Penrose and Josephine Tey.

This entry was posted in Fiction, Historical Fiction, Mysteries/Crime. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to An Expert in Murder

  1. Marg says:

    Darn! I was just about to return this to the library unread because I need to get the number of books I have out down to a more reasonable level. Now I can’t thanks to your review!

  2. litlove says:

    I have this on my shelf to read, but keep hesitating to pick it up because I have seen mixed reviews. Still, I am intrigued and I will find the right moment for it eventually, I’m sure.

  3. Ann says:

    I had real problems with this for precisely the reason you mention. I couldn’t reconcile myself to the use of real people, especially as some of them are not long dead and are dealt with rather shabbily. They may not have been particularly nice people, but I don’t see the need to air that in public. Having said that I have a friend whose parents are in it and she loves it. So it takes all sorts of readers, doesn’t it.

  4. Annabel says:

    I recently read my first Tey novel in preparation for reading Upson’s two. It will be really interesting to see how she mixes real people with fictional, and after your positive review I shall hope to read it sooner rather than later.

  5. Steph says:

    Great review! I recently struggled with a Tey novel (I just could not plow through Daughter of Time, owing to the fact that I know next to nothing about English history and I was totally lost in the flood of characters! I couldn’t keep track!), but I’d still be up for giving this a go. I do have a penchant for mysteries set during the “Golden Age”, so despite its flaws I could see myself having fun with this one.

  6. Eva says:

    You and I apparently have the exact same taste in mysteries (Lord Wimsey! Mary Russell! lol), so I’ll be trying this one out! :)

  7. Kristen M. says:

    I already decided to read this long ago but I enjoyed your review anyway. :)

    It’s funny that you brought up the use of a real person in a fictional setting thing. I was discussing this with someone just the other day and how so many of the current historical fictions might work better as just fictions – fictional royalty, fictional authors, etc. When real lives are fictionalized, there’s just too much room for the author to take liberties with someone’s actual persona.

  8. Jenny says:

    Marg — it is my life’s goal to increase funding for libraries through fines…

    Litlove — it’s worth a read, at the right moment.

    Ann — I think real people in fiction can be well done or poorly done. This was somewhere in between for me — well written, but it didn’t convince me of the necessity.

    Annabel — how did you like the Tey novel?

    Steph — oh no, you didn’t like Daughter of Time? I love that one. Try Brat Farrar, that’s not historical and probably my favorite Tey novel.

    Eva — I’ve noticed before that we are twins when it comes to mysteries!

    Kristen — I’m not sure what’s with the real-person-in-mysteries trend. It can be great (see Dorothy Dunnett) but you have to be very careful, imho.

  9. Carey says:

    Oh boy, a historical mystery that I haven’t heard of yet! This sounds really good and is a new-to-me author. Thanks for a great review!

  10. Danielle says:

    I really enjoyed this one, too. I’ve been trying to not buy anymore hardcovers, so I’m hoping the next book is going to be published soon in paperback (in the UK anyway–I don’t think it’s even listed yet on Amazon!).

  11. Pingback: In Which My TBR List Grows Some More « A Striped Armchair

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.