I was going to title this post “The Last Frontier,” because by reading Georgette Heyer’s Regency romance Cotillion, I feel as if I’ve crossed some kind of Rubicon. I am by no means a genre snob, but I think of myself as mostly enjoying literary fiction, classics, and mysteries. That means that when I try other genres, I experience a little discombobulation: westerns? Really? Well, I adored Lonesome Dove and Cormac McCarthy’s All the Pretty Horses trilogy. Seafaring stories? I’m addicted to Patrick O’Brian. Science fiction? Comic books? Horror? Check, check, and check — as long as it’s well-written and tells a compelling story. Sturgeon’s Law that 90% of everything is crap applies here, literary fiction included: you have to be discerning no matter what genre you’re reading. And besides that, I have an almost absolute pleasure principle about reading. If you enjoy reading something I wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole, more power to you! I don’t believe in “shoulds” when it comes to reading for pleasure.

But romance novels? I admit, with embarrassment, that I have been a snob about them. I have eclectic taste, I would think… except romances. Simplistic, cliched, sexist, ill-written, everything I dislike. To Be Avoided. But then I discovered that Michael Dirda placed Georgette Heyer among the Great Entertainers. He claims she’s not to be missed, and since, for me, Michael Dirda has been batting a thousand with his recommendations, I couldn’t disregard that lightly. So I picked up Cotillion.

The plot is simple enough. Kitty’s irascible great-uncle Matthew has made his will: his enormous fortune will go to Kitty if, and only if, she marries one of his great-nephews. There’s the rake, Jack, with whom Kitty has been in schoolgirl love for ten years; the vague and hapless dandy Freddy; the sanctimonious Hugh and the imbecile Dolph. An impossible choice? Not for Kitty, who convinces Freddy to agree to a sham betrothal so that she may come to London to enjoy a month’s revelry before all is discovered. I’m sure you can guess the happy ending. Unpredictability is not the shining virtue of this book. What surprised and delighted me was the execution of it. Heyer’s writing is wonderful, her characterization exquisite. Her period detail, unlike so many people who write historical novels, is accurate to the smallest degree. She’s funny, and more than funny, she’s witty; her heroine is not “spunky” or “feisty” but strong and good (if a bit headstrong.) And Freddy, who inherits his style from Freddy Arbuthnot and Freddy Eynsford-Hill, reminded me in the end of no one so much as a very young, pre-war Peter Wimsey, full of piffle. My one, modest objection was that Heyer overdid the exclamation points a little. But that’s just my taste, and once I got into the story I got used to it. 

I enjoyed this book enormously. I can see that Heyer will become a favorite for light reading, beach reading, comfort reading. Once again, Michael Dirda steers me right: one of the Great Entertainers, indeed. And if there are any genres left for me to read, don’t hesitate to introduce me!

This entry was posted in Fiction, Historical Fiction. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Cotillion

  1. Teresa says:

    I’ve been wondering about Heyer. Her name keeps popping up on blogs by people who appear to have tastes very similar to mine, but everything about the packaging of her books just screams cheesy to me, so I’ve remained skeptical. But if you like her, I’m bound to enjoy her too.

  2. Elaine says:

    To say that I adore Heyer is putting it mildly. I discovered here when I was off school sick many years ago, at the age of 13 and my sister, a trainee librarian, brought me The Talisman Ring to read. I devoured it in one afternoon and she was then ordered to raid the shelves for other Heyers. She then brought me back seven and I was off and have loved her ever since. She is witty, amusing and sparkling as well as down to earth and trenchant. Her book An Infamous Army, contains a description of the Battle of Waterloo which is quite superb and is still used at Sandhurst Military School in training. And it was not until I discovered and read Jane Austen that I then realised just how good Heyer was in capturing the essence of that historical period, I am sure Jane will not mind me saying this.

    I have just discovered your blog and am going to link it as I can already see how much I am going to enjoy reading it. I am not going to rave any more else this comment will be longer than your post but if ever you wish to discuss all things Heyer please do email me at the address at top of my blog. I have several posts I have written on my blog and one on Estelles Revenge about Heyer and am quite determined to spread the word on this wonderful writer who is deemed a ‘romantic’ writer and dismissed.

    I had better stop now…

  3. Jenny says:

    Teresa — give her a whirl. It is light reading, but tremendously enjoyable — funny, well-observed, well-characterized. I think you’ll like it.

    Elaine — thanks for stopping by! I definitely intend to read more Heyer. In fact, I think it was a recommendation I read on your blog that tipped the balance for me and made me pick it up at last. So I thank you!

Leave your comment here, and feel free to respond to others' comments. We enjoy a lively conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.